Paper detail

A Study on the Security Requirements Analysis to build a Zero Trust-based Remote Work Environment

Recently, the usage of cloud services has been increasing annually, and with remote work becoming one of the new forms of employment within enterprises, the security of cloud-based remote work environments has become important. The existing work environment relies on a perimeter security model, where accessing one's resources is based on the assumption that everything within the internal network is secure. However, due to the limitations of the perimeter security model, which assumes the safety of everything within the internal network, the adoption of Zero Trust is now being demanded. Accordingly, NIST and DoD have published guidelines related to Zero Trust architecture. However, these guidelines describe security requirements at an abstract level, focusing on logical architecture. In this paper, we conduct a threat modeling for OpenStack cloud to propose more detailed security requirements compared to NIST and DoD guidelines. Subsequently, we perform a security analysis of commercial cloud services such as Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Service, and Google Cloud to validate these requirements. The security analysis results identify security requirements that each cloud service fails to satisfy, indicating potential exposure to threats. This paper proposes detailed security requirements based on the Zero Trust model and conducts security analyses of various cloud services accordingly. As a result of the security analysis, we proposed potential threats and countermeasures for cloud services with Zero Trust, and this is intended to help build a secure Zero Trust-based remote work environment.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.