Paper detail

A study of the low-mass X-ray binary dip sources XB 1916-053, XB 1323-619, X 1624-490 and 4U 1746-371 observed with INTEGRAL

We detect dipping activity/modulations in the light curve of the four LMXBs in the 3--10 keV and 20--40 keV energy ranges. The spectral parameters derived from the fits to the INTEGRAL data are consistent with hot coronal structures in these systems where we find a range of plasma temperatures 3.0--224.9 keV. The unabsorbed X-ray to soft Gamma-ray flux between 4--200 keV are 5.9$\times 10^{-10}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ for XB 1916-053, 3.3$\times 10^{-10}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ for XB 1323-619, 21.6$\times 10^{-10}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ for X 1624-490 and 11.0$\times 10^{-10}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ for 4U 1746-371. The optical depth to Compton scattering, $τ$, varies in a range 4.4--0.002 consistent with electron densities $n_e$ $<$ 1.4$\times 10^{15}$ cm$^{-3}$. In general, we find no significant difference in the dip and non-dip spectra in the ISGRI energy range (above 20 keV) for all the four sources. We only detect absorption differences between dipping and non-dipping intervals for XB 1916-053 and X 1624-490 in the JEM-X energy range. Fits in the 4--200 keV range including an additional photo-ionized absorber model for the two sources show that XB 1916-053 has the highest ionized absorber amoung the two.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.