Paper detail

A study of the Heliocentric dependence of Shock Standoff Distance and Geometry using 2.5D MHD Simulations of CME-driven shocks

We perform four numerical magnetohydrodynamic simulations in 2.5 dimensions (2.5D) of fast Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) and their associated shock fronts between 10Rs and 300Rs. We investigate the relative change in the shock standoff distance, Sd, as a fraction of the CME radial half-width, Dob (i.e. Sd/Dob). Previous hydrodynamic studies have related the shock standoff distance for Earths magnetosphere to the density compression ratio (DR,Ru/Rd) measured across the bow shock (Spreiter, Summers and Alksne 1966). The DR coefficient, kdr, which is the proportionality constant between the relative standoff distance (Sd/Dob) and the compression ratio, was semi-empirically estimated as 1.1. For CMEs, we show that this value varies linearly as a function of heliocentric distance and changes significantly for different radii of curvature of the CMEs leading edge. We find that a value of 0.8+-0.1 is more appropriate for small heliocentric distances (<30Rs) which corresponds to the spherical geometry of a magnetosphere presented by Seiff (1962). As the CME propagates its cross section becomes more oblate and the kdr value increases linearly with heliocentric distance, such that kdr= 1.1 is most appropriate at a heliocentric distance of about 80Rs. For terrestrial distances (215Rs) we estimate kdr= 1.8+-0.3, which also indicates that the CME cross-sectional structure is generally more oblate than that of Earths magnetosphere. These alterations to the proportionality coefficients may serve to improve investigations into the estimates of the magnetic field in the corona upstream of a CME as well as the aspect ratio of CMEs as measured in situ.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.