Paper detail

A study of the constraining power of high P_T observables in heavy-ion collisions

Since the start of the LHC heavy ion program, a multitude of rather different high transverse momentum (P_T) observables has become available to study the physics of the interaction of hard partons with a QCD medium. Similarly, multiple theoretical models for this interaction exist and have been compared with available data, and regularly physics conclusions are drawn based on the agreement of a model with a particular data subset. However, such an agreement is only a necessary condition to identify a physics mechanism, not a sufficient one - it needs to be demonstrated that the agreement is not accidential or generic, in other words the observable actually needs to measure the physics in question. The aim of the study presented here is to illustrate this problem by computing various high P_T observables in three different models, two of which are known to be grossly wrong ab initio, and to study in which observables what amount of discrepancy with the data appears. The surprising outcome is that jet yield observables are not very sensitive to the physics mechanism of jet-medium interaction and hence do not constrain models well.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.