Paper detail

A Study of the B/C Ratio Between 10 MeV/nuc and 1 TeV/nuc in Cosmic Rays Using New Voyager and AMS-2 Data and a Comparison with the Predictions of Leaky Box Propagation Models

This paper seeks to find an explanation of the galactic cosmic ray B/C ratio newly measured in cosmic rays between ~10 MeV/nuc and 1 TeV/nuc. Voyager measurements of this ratio at low energies and AMS-2 measurements at high energies are used in this study. These measurements both considerably exceed at both low and high energies the ratio predicted using a simple Leaky Box Model for propagation of cosmic rays in the galaxy. Between 1-70 GeV/nuc, however, this same model provides an excellent fit (within +2-3%) to the new AMS-2 measurements using an escape length ~P-0.45. This would imply a diffusion coefficient ~P0.45, very close to the Kraichian cascade value of 0.50 for the exponent. Extending this same diffusion dependence to high energies, still in a LBM, along with a truncation of short path lengths in the galaxy will predict a B/C ratio of 4.5% at ~800 GeV/nuc which is very close to the AMS-2 measurement at that energy. This would indicate that the amount of material traversed near the source in a Nested LBM, for example, is less than about 0.5 g/cm2 at these energies since this process, with additional matter near the sources, would increase the B/C ratio. At low energies, however, the B/C ratio of 14% +3% at ~10 MeV/nuc measured by Voyager is more difficult to explain. The same parameters used in a LBM that fit the high energy B/C measurements predicts a B/C ratio of only ~4% at 10 MeV/nuc where the path length is about 1.5 g/cm2. If the cosmic rays have traversed ~10 g/cm2 of material in the galaxy at low energies the prediction for B/C is still only 8%, which is between 2.0-3.0 sigma below the measurement and its errors.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.