Paper detail

A Study of Excited Charm-Strange Baryons with Evidence for new Baryons Ξ_c(3055)^+ and Ξ_c(3123)^+

We present a study of excited charm-strange baryon states produced in $e^+e^-$ annihilations at or near a center-of-mass energy of $10.58\mathrm{Ge\kern -0.1em V}$, in a data sample with an integrated luminosity of $384 fb^{-1}$ recorded with the BABAR detector at the PEP-II $e^+e^-$ storage rings at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. We study strong decays of charm-strange baryons to $Λ_c^+K^0_{\scriptscriptstyle S}$, $Λ_c^+K^-$, $Λ_c^+K^-π^+$, $Λ_c^+K^0_{\scriptscriptstyle S}π^-$, $Λ_c^+K^0_{\scriptscriptstyle S}π^-π^+$, and $Λ_c^+K^-π^+π^-$. This study confirms the existence of the states $Ξ_c(2980)^+$, $Ξ_c(3077)^+$, and $Ξ_c(3077)^0$, with a more accurate determination of the $Ξ_c(2980)^+$ mass and width. We also present evidence for two new states, $Ξ_c(3055)^+$ and $Ξ_c(3123)^+$, decaying through the intermediate resonant modes $Σ_c(2455)^{++}K^-$ and $Σ_c(2520)^{++}K^-$, respectively. For each of these baryons, we measure the yield in each final state, determine the statistical significance, and calculate the product of the production cross-section and branching fractions. We also measure the masses and widths of these excited charm-strange baryons.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.