Paper detail

A Study of Cepheids in M81 with the Large Binocular Telescope (Efficiently Calibrated with HST)

We identify and phase a sample of 107 Cepheids with 10<P/days<100 in M81 using the LBT and calibrate their BVI mean magnitudes with archival HST data. The use of a ground-based telescope to identify and phase the Cepheids and HST only for the final calibration reduces the demand on HST by nearly an order of magnitude and yields Period-Luminosity (PL) relations with dispersions comparable to the best LMC samples. We fit the sample using the OGLE-II LMC PL relations and are unable to find a self-consistent distance for different band combinations or radial locations within M81. We can do so after adding a radial dependence to the PL zero point that corresponds to a luminosity dependence on metallicity of g_mu=-0.56+/-0.36 mag/dex. We find marginal evidence for a shift in color as a function of metallicity, distinguishable from the effects of extinction, of g_2=+0.07+/-0.03 mag/dex. We find a distance modulus for M81, relative to the LMC, of mu(M81-LMC)=9.39+/-0.14 mag, including uncertainties due to the metallicity corrections. This corresponds to a distance to M81 of 3.6+/-0.2 Mpc, assuming a LMC distance modulus of 18.41 mag. We carry out a joint analysis of M81 and NGC4258 Cepheids and simultaneously solve for the distance of M81 relative to NGC4258 and the metallicity corrections. Given the current data, the uncertainties of such joint fits are dominated by the relative metallicities and the abundance gradients rather than by measurement errors of the Cepheid magnitudes or colors. We find mu(M81-LMC)=9.40 (-0.11/+0.15) mag, mu(N4258-LMC)=11.08 (-0.17/+0.21) mag and mu(N4258-M81)=1.68+/-0.08 mag and joint metallicity corrections of g_mu=-0.62 (-0.35/+0.31) mag/dex and g_2=0.01+/-0.01 mag/dex. Quantitative analyses of Cepheid distances must take into account both the metallicity dependencies of the Cepheids and the uncertainties in the abundance estimates. (ABRIDGED)

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.