Paper detail

A Study of 13 Powerful Classical Double Radio Galaxies

We have carried out an extensive study of a sample of 13 large, powerful Fanaroff-Riley type II radio galaxies with the Very Large Array in multiple configurations at 330 MHz, 1.4, 5 and 8 GHz. We present the total intensity, polarization, spectral index, and rotation measure maps of the sources. On the whole the 13 FRII sources have symmetric structures with arm-length ratios close to unity, small misalignment angles and low values of radio core prominence, suggesting that these radio galaxies lie close to the plane of the sky. We have revisited some well known radio galaxy correlations using a large combined dataset comprising our radio galaxies and others from the literature. We confirm that the hotspot size correlates with the core-hotspot distance. The hotspot spectral index is correlated with, and flatter than the lobe spectral index, consistent with the assumptions of spectral aging models. Both the hotspot and lobe spectral index are correlated with redshift. The depolarization asymmetry in the lobes is not correlated with the radio core prominence or misalignment angle, which are statistical indicators of orientation. The `Liu-Pooley' correlation of lobe depolarization with the lobe spectral index is significant in our radio galaxy sample. Further, the lobe with the steeper spectral index and greater depolarization is shorter and fatter. The arm-length ratio seems to be correlated with the misalignment angle between the two sides of the radio source and strongly anti-correlated with the axial ratio, consistent with environmental effects and/or a change in the outflow direction. In this sample, asymmetries in the local environments and/or motion of the outflow axis are likely to be more important than relativistic beaming effects.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.