Paper detail

A Structured Hardware Software Architecture for Peptide Based Diagnosis - Sub-string Matching Problem with Limited Tolerance (ICIAfS14)

The problem of inferring proteins from complex peptide samples in shotgun proteomic workflow sets extreme demands on computational resources. This is exacerbated by the fact that, in general, a given protein cannot be defined by a fixed sequence of amino acids due to the existence of splice variants and isoforms of that protein. Therefore, the problem of protein inference could be considered as one of identifying sequences of amino acids with some limited tolerance. Two problems arise from this: a) due to these variations, the applicability of exact string matching methodologies could be questioned and b) the difficulty of defining a reference sequence for a particular set of proteins that are functionally indistinguishable, but with some variation in features. This paper presents a model-based inference approach that is developed and validated to solve the inference problem. Our approach starts from an examination of the known set of splice variants and isoforms of a target protein to identify the Greatest Common Stable Substring (GCSS) of amino acids and the Substrings Subjects to Limited Variation (SSLV) and their respective locations on the GCSS. Then we define and solve the Sub-string Matching Problem with Limited Tolerance (SMPLT). This approach is validated on identified peptides in a labelled and clustered data set from UNIPROT. Identification of Baylisascaris Procyonis infection was used as an application instance that achieved up to 70 times speedup compared to a software only system. This workflow can be generalised to any inexact multiple pattern matching application by replacing the patterns in a clustered and distributed environment which permits a distance between member strings to account for permitted deviations such as substitutions, insertions and deletions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.