Paper detail

A strongly changing accretion morphology during the outburst decay of the neutron star X-ray binary 4U 1608-52

It is commonly assumed that the properties and geometry of the accretion flow in transient low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) significantly change when the X-ray luminosity decays below $\sim 10^{-2}$ of the Eddington limit ($L_{\rm Edd}$). However, there are few observational cases where the evolution of the accretion flow is tracked in a single X-ray binary over a wide dynamic range. In this work, we use NuSTAR and NICER observations obtained during the 2018 accretion outburst of the neutron star LMXB 4U 1608-52, to study changes in the reflection spectrum. We find that the broad Fe-K$α$ line and Compton hump, clearly seen during the peak of the outburst when the X-ray luminosity is $\sim 10^{37}$ erg/s ($\sim 0.05$ $L_{\rm Edd}$), disappear during the decay of the outburst when the source luminosity drops to $\sim 4.5 \times 10^{35}$ erg/s ($\sim 0.002$ $L_{\rm Edd}$). We show that this non-detection of the reflection features cannot be explained by the lower signal-to-noise at lower flux, but is instead caused by physical changes in the accretion flow. Simulating synthetic NuSTAR observations on a grid of inner disk radius, disk ionisation, and reflection fraction, we find that the disappearance of the reflection features can be explained by either increased disk ionisation ($\log ξ\geq 4.1$) or a much decreased reflection fraction. A changing disk truncation alone, however, cannot account for the lack of reprocessed Fe-K$α$ emission. The required increase in ionisation parameter could occur if the inner accretion flow evaporates from a thin disk into a geometrically thicker flow, such as the commonly assumed formation of an radiatively inefficient accretion flow at lower mass accretion rates.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.