Paper detail

A Strong Law of Large Numbers under Sublinear Expectations

We consider a sequence of i.i.d. random variables $\{ξ_k\}$under a sublinear expectation $\mathbb{E}=\sup_{P\inΘ}E_P$. We first give a new proof to the fact that, under each $P\inΘ$, any cluster point of the empirical averages $\barξ_n=(ξ_1+\cdots+ξ_n)/n$ lies in $[\underlineμ, \barμ]$ with $\underlineμ=-\mathbb{E}[-ξ_1], \barμ=\mathbb{E}[ξ_1]$. Then, we consider sublinear expectations on a Polish space $Ω$, and show that for each constant $μ\in [\underlineμ,\barμ]$, there exists a probability $P_μ\inΘ$ such that \begin {eqnarray}\label {intro-a.s.} \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\barξ_n=μ, \ P_μ\textmd{-a.s.}, \end {eqnarray} supposing that $Θ$ is weakly compact and $\{ξ_n\}\in L^1_{\mathbb{E}}(Ω)$. Under the same conditions, we can get a generalization of (\ref {intro-a.s.}) in the product space $Ω=\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}}$ with $μ\in [\underlineμ,\barμ]$ replaced by $Π=π(ξ_1, \cdots,ξ_d)\in [\underlineμ,\barμ]$, where $π$ is a Borel measurable function on $\mathbb{R}^d$, $d\in\mathbb{R}$. Finally, we characterize the triviality of the tail $σ$-algebra of i.i.d. random variables under a sublinear expectation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.