Paper detail

A strong direct product theorem in terms of the smooth rectangle bound

A strong direct product theorem states that, in order to solve k instances of a problem, if we provide less than k times the resource required to compute one instance, then the probability of overall success is exponentially small in k. In this paper, we consider the model of two-way public-coin communication complexity and show a strong direct product theorem for all relations in terms of the smooth rectangle bound, introduced by Jain and Klauck as a generic lower bound method in this model. Our result therefore uniformly implies a strong direct product theorem for all relations for which an (asymptotically) optimal lower bound can be provided using the smooth rectangle bound, for example Inner Product, Greater-Than, Set-Disjointness, Gap-Hamming Distance etc. Our result also implies near optimal direct product results for several important functions and relations used to show exponential separations between classical and quantum communication complexity, for which near optimal lower bounds are provided using the rectangle bound, for example by Raz [1999], Gavinsky [2008] and Klartag and Regev [2011]. In fact we are not aware of any relation for which it is known that the smooth rectangle bound does not provide an optimal lower bound. This lower bound subsumes many of the other lower bound methods, for example the rectangle bound (a.k.a the corruption bound), the smooth discrepancy bound (a.k.a the γ_2 bound) which in turn subsumes the discrepancy bound, the subdistribution bound and the conditional min-entropy bound. We show our result using information theoretic arguments. A key tool we use is a sampling protocol due to Braverman [2012], in fact a modification of it used by Kerenidis, Laplante, Lerays, Roland and Xiao [2012].

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.