Paper detail

A stochastic agent-based extension of the GSM2 model for particle therapy: cell-cycle dynamics, dose-rate dependence, and fractionation effects

Accurately linking microscopic energy deposition from ionizing radiation to emergent biological outcomes remains a central challenge in radiobiological modelling, particularly when stochastic damage induction, cell-cycle dynamics, and spatial organisation within irradiated tissues must be treated explicitly and consistently across scales. To address this, we introduce a stochastic agent-based radiobiological modelling framework for simulating biological response to particle irradiation, developed as an explicit single-cell extension of the Generalized Stochastic Microdosimetric Model (GSM2). Each cell is represented as an autonomous agent whose internal state, including DNA lesion counts, cell-cycle phase, and oxygenation level, evolves according to a continuous-time Markov chain driven by GSM2 transition rates. Radiation-induced damage induction, repair, misrepair, cell-cycle progression, proliferation, and migration are treated as competing stochastic events resolved through a next-event, event-driven algorithm, which provides computationally efficient scaling with system size while preserving full single-cell resolution. The framework is applied to three-dimensional tumour spheroids irradiated with 1H and 12C ions across a range of energies and dose rates. We characterise the spatiotemporal evolution of cell-cycle phase composition and spheroid volume following irradiation, and examine the dependence of cell survival on dose rate over four orders of magnitude. Several empirically established trends in biological response, including the dose-rate dependence of cell survival, its attenuation at high LET, and the inverse dose rate effect in split-dose irradiation, emerge from the model through the explicit coupling of particle arrivals, damage accumulation, and repair kinetics, without recourse to empirical correction factors as typically done.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.