Paper detail

A statistical study of the properties of large amplitude whistler waves and their association with few eV to 30 keV electron distributions observed in the magnetosphere by Wind

We present a statistical study of the characteristics of very large amplitude whistler waves inside the terrestrial magnetosphere using waveform capture data from the Wind spacecraft as an addition of the study by Kellogg et al., [2010b]. We observed 244(65) whistler waves using electric(magnetic) field data from the Wind spacecraft finding ~40%(~62%) of the waves have peak-to-peak amplitudes of >/- 50 mV/m(>/- 0.5 nT). We present an example waveform capture of the largest magnetic field amplitude (>/- 8 nT peak-to-peak) whistler wave ever reported in the radiation belts. The estimated Poynting flux magnitude associated with this wave is >/- 300 microW/m^2, roughly four orders of magnitude above previous estimates. Such large Poynting flux values are consistent with rapid energization of electrons. The majority of the largest amplitude whistlers occur during magnetically active periods (AE > 200 nT). The waves were observed to exhibit a broad range of propagation angles with respect to the magnetic field, 0° </- θ_kB < 90°, which showed no consistent variation with magnetic latitude. These results are inconsistent with the idea that the whistlers are all generated at the equator, propagating along the magnetic field, and that the observed obliqueness is due to propagation effects. We also identified three types of electron distributions observed simultaneously with the whistler waves including beam-like, beam/flattop, and anisotropic distributions. The whistlers exhibited different characteristics depending on the observed electron distributions. The majority of the waveforms observed in our study have f/f_ce </- 0.5 and are observed primarily in the radiation belts simultaneously with anisotropic electron distributions.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.