Paper detail

A Statistical Study of GRB X-ray Flares: Evidence of Ubiquitous Bulk Acceleration in the Emission Region

When emission in a conical relativistic jet ceases abruptly (or decays sharply), the observed decay light curve is controlled by the high-latitude "curvature effect". Recently, Uhm & Zhang found that the decay slopes of three GRB X-ray flares are steeper than what the standard model predicts. This requires bulk acceleration of the emission region, which is consistent with a Poynting-flux-dominated outflow. In this paper, we systematically analyze a sample of 85 bright X-ray flares detected in 63 Swift GRBs, and investigate the relationship between the temporal decay index $α$ and spectral index $β$ during the steep decay phase of these flares. The $α$ value depends on the choice of the zero time point $t_0$. We adopt two methods. "Method I" takes $t_0^I$ as the first rising data point of each flare, and is the most conservative approach. We find that at 99.9% condifence level 56/85 flares have decay slopes steeper than the simplest curvature effect prediction, and therefore, are in the acceleration regime. "Method II" extrapolates the rising light curve of each flare backwards until the flux density is three orders of magnitude lower than the peak flux density, and defines the corresponding time as the time zero point (t_0^II). We find that 74/85 flares fall into the acceleration regime at 99.9% condifence level. This suggests that bulk acceleration is common, may be even ubiquitous among X-ray flares, pointing towards a Poynting-flux-dominated jet composition for these events.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.