Paper detail

A statistical model to explain the gamma-ray variability and flares of the Crab nebula

Recently the AGILE and Fermi/LAT detectors uncovered giant $γ$-ray flares from the Crab nebula. The duration of these flares is a few days. The Fermi/LAT data with monthly time binning further showed significant variability of the synchrotron tail of the emission, while the inverse Compton component was stable. The simultaneous or follow-up observations in X-ray, optical, infrared and radio bands did not find significant flux variation. Based on these observations, we propose that the $γ$-ray variability and flares are due to statistical fluctuations of knots that can accelerate electrons to $\sim$PeV energies. The maximum achievable energy of electrons is adopted to be proportional to the size of the knot, which is assumed to follow a power-law distribution. Thus the low energy electron flux will be stable due to the large number of small knots, while the high energy electron flux may experience large fluctuations. Monte Carlo realization of such a picture can reproduce the observational data quite well given proper model parameters.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.