Paper detail

A Statistical Method to Search for Recoiling Supermassive Black Holes in Active Galactic Nuclei

We propose an observational test for gravitationally recoiling supermassive black holes (BHs) in active galactic nuclei, based on a correlation between the velocities of BHs relative to their host galaxies, |Δv|, and their obscuring dust column densities, Σ_{dust} (both measured along the line of sight). We use toy models for the distribution of recoil velocities, BH trajectories, and the geometry of obscuring dust tori in galactic centres, to simulate 2.5x10^5 random observations of recoiling quasars. BHs with recoil velocities comparable to the escape velocity from the galactic centre remain bound to the nucleus, and do not fully settle back to the centre of the torus due to dynamical friction in a typical quasar lifetime. We find that |Δv| and Σ_ {dust} for these BHs are positively correlated. For obscured (Σ_{dust}>0) and for partially obscured (0<Σ_{dust}<~2.3 g/m^2) quasars with |Δv|>=45 km/s, the sample correlation coefficient between log10(|Δv|) and Σ_{dust} is r_{45} = 0.28+/-0.02 and r_{45} = 0.13+/-0.02, respectively. Allowing for random +/-100 km/s errors in |Δv| unrelated to the recoil dilutes the correlation for the partially obscured quasars to r_{45} = 0.026+/-0.004 measured between |Δv| and Σ_{dust}. A random sample of >~3,500 obscured quasars with |Δv|>=45 km/s would allow rejection of the no-correlation hypothesis with 3 sigma significance 95% of the time. Finally, we find that the fraction of obscured quasars, F_{obs}(|Δv|), decreases with |Δv| from F_{obs}(<10 km/s)>~0.8 to F_{obs}(>10^3 km/s)<~0.4. This predicted trend can be compared to the observed fraction of type II quasars, and can further test combinations of recoil, trajectory, and dust torus models.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.