Paper detail

A Statistical Framework for Optimizing and Evaluating MRI of T1 and T2 Relaxometry Approaches

This paper proposes a statistical framework to optimize and evaluate the MR parameter $T_1$ and $T_2$ mapping capabilities for quantitative MRI relaxometry approaches. This analysis explores the intrinsic MR parameter estimate precision per unit scan time, termed the $T_{1,2}$-to-noise ratio (TNR) efficiency, for different ranges of biologically realistic relaxation times. The TNR efficiency is defined in terms of the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB), a statistical lower bound on the parameter estimate variance. Geometrically interpreting the new TNR efficiency definition reveals a more complete model describing the factors controlling the $T_1$/$T_2$ mapping capabilities. This paper compares $T_1$ mapping approaches including the inversion recovery (IR) family sequences and the Look-Locker (LL) sequence and simultaneous $T_1$ and $T_2$ mapping approaches including the spin-echo inversion recovery (SEIR) and driven equilibrium single pulse observation of $T_1$/$T_2$ (DESPOT) sequences. All pulse parameters are optimized to maximize the TNR efficiency within different $T_1$ and $T_2$ ranges of interest. Monte Carlo simulations with non-linear least square estimation (NLSE) of $T_1$/$T_2$ validated the theoretical predictions on the estimator performances.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.