Paper detail

A Statistical Fractal-Diffusive Avalanche Model of a Slowly-Driven Self-Organized Criticality System

We develop a statistical analytical model that predicts the occurrence frequency distributions and parameter correlations of avalanches in nonlinear dissipative systems in the state of a slowly-driven self-organized criticality (SOC) system. This model, called the fractal-diffusive SOC model, is based on the following four assumptions: (i) The avalanche size $L$ grows as a diffusive random walk with time $T$, following $L \propto T^{1/2}$; (ii) The instantaneous energy dissipation rate $f(t)$ occupies a fractal volume with dimension $D_S$, which predicts the relationships $F = f(t=T) \propto L^{D_S} \propto T^{D_S/2}$, $P \propto L^{S} \propto T^{S/2}$ for the peak energy dissipation rate, and $E \propto F T \propto T^{1+D_S/2}$ for the total dissipated energy; (iii) The mean fractal dimension of avalanches in Euclidean space $S=1,2,3$ is $D_S \approx (1+S)/2$; and (iv) The occurrence frequency distributions $N(x) \propto x^{-α_x}$ based on spatially uniform probabilities in a SOC system are given by $N(L) \propto L^{-S}$, which predicts powerlaw distributions for all parameters, with the slopes $α_T=(1+S)/2$, $α_F=1+(S-1)/D_S$, $α_P=2-1/S$, and $α_E=1+(S-1)/(D_S+2)$. We test the predicted fractal dimensions, occurrence frequency distributions, and correlations with numerical simulations of cellular automaton models in three dimensions $S=1,2,3$ and find satisfactory agreement within $\approx 10%$. One profound prediction of this universal SOC model is that the energy distribution has a powerlaw slope in the range of $α_E=1.40-1.67$, and the peak energy distribution has a slope of $α_P=1.67$ (for any fractal dimension $D_S=1,...,3$ in Euclidean space S=3), and thus predicts that the bulk energy is always contained in the largest events, which rules out significant nanoflare heating in the case of solar flares.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.