Paper detail

A Standardized Pipeline for Colon Nuclei Identification and Counting Challenge

Nuclear segmentation and classification is an essential step for computational pathology. TIA lab from Warwick University organized a nuclear segmentation and classification challenge (CoNIC) for H&E stained histopathology images in colorectal cancer with two highly correlated tasks, nuclei segmentation and classification task and cellular composition task. There are a few obstacles we have to address in this challenge, 1) limited training samples, 2) color variation, 3) imbalanced annotations, 4) similar morphological appearance among classes. To deal with these challenges, we proposed a standardized pipeline for nuclear segmentation and classification by integrating several pluggable components. First, we built a GAN-based model to automatically generate pseudo images for data augmentation. Then we trained a self-supervised stain normalization model to solve the color variation problem. Next we constructed a baseline model HoVer-Net with cost-sensitive loss to encourage the model pay more attention on the minority classes. According to the results of the leaderboard, our proposed pipeline achieves 0.40665 mPQ+ (Rank 49th) and 0.62199 r2 (Rank 10th) in the preliminary test phase.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.