Paper detail

A stability criterion for the non-linear wave equation with spatial inhomogeneity

In this paper the non-linear wave equation with a spatial inhomogeneity is considered. The inhomogeneity splits the unbounded spatial domain into three or more intervals, on each of which the non-linear wave equation is homogeneous. In such setting, there often exist multiple stationary fronts. In this paper we present a necessary and sufficient stability criterion in terms of the length of the middle interval(s) and the energy associated with the front in these interval(s). To prove this criterion, it is shown that critical points of the length function and zeros of the linearisation have the same order. Furthermore, the Evans function is used to identify the stable branch. The criterion is illustrated with an example which shows the existence of bi-stability: two stable fronts, one of which is non-monotonic. The Evans function also give a sufficient instability criterion in terms of the derivative of the length function.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.