Paper detail

A split-step finite-element method for incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with high-order accuracy up-to the boundary

An efficient and accurate finite-element algorithm is described for the numerical solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes (INS) equations. The new algorithm that solves the INS equations in a velocity-pressure reformulation is based on a split-step scheme in conjunction with the standard finite-element method. The split-step scheme employed for the temporal discretization of our algorithm completely separates the pressure updates from the solution of velocity variables. When the pressure equation is formed explicitly, the algorithm avoids solving a saddle-point problem; therefore, our algorithm has more flexibility in choosing finite-element spaces. For efficiency and robustness, Lagrange finite elements of equal order for both velocity and pressure are used. Motivated by a post-processing technique that calculates derivatives of a finite element solution with super-convergent error estimates, an alternative numerical boundary condition is proposed for the pressure equation at the discrete level. The new numerical pressure boundary condition that can be regarded as a better implementation of the compatibility boundary condition improves the boundary-layer errors of the pressure solution. Normal-mode analysis is performed using a simplified model problem on a uniform mesh to demonstrate the numerical properties of our methods. Convergence study using $\mathbb{P}_1$ elements confirms the analytical results and demonstrates that our algorithm with the new numerical boundary condition achieves the optimal second-order accuracy for both velocity and pressure up-to the boundary. Benchmark problems are also computed and carefully compared with existing studies. Finally, as an example to illustrate that our approach can be easily adapted for higher-order finite elements, we solve the classical flow-past-a-cylinder problem using $\mathbb{P}_n$ finite elements with $n\geq 1$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.