Paper detail

A Spinor Approach to Penrose Inequality

Consider an asymptotically Euclidean initial data set with a smooth marginally trapped surface (possibly a union of future and past multi-connected components) as inner boundary. By a further development of the spinorial framework underlying the positive energy theorem, a refined Witten identity is worked out and in the maximal slicing case, a close connection of the identity with a conformal invariant of Yamabe type is revealed. A Kato-Yau inequality for the Sen-Witten operator is also proven from a conformal geometry perspective. Guided by the Hamiltonian picture underlying the spinorial framework, a Penrose type inequality is then proven to the effect that given the dominant energy condition, the ADM energy-momentum is, up to a non-zero constant less than unity, bounded by the areal radius of the marginally trapped surface. To establish the Penrose inequality in full generality, it is then sufficient to show that the norm of the Sen-Witten spinor, subject to the APS boundary condition imposed on a suitably defined outermost marginally trapped surface, is bounded below by that attained in the Schwarzschild metric.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.