Paper detail

A Specification of Open Transactional Memory for Haskell

Transactional memory (TM) has emerged as a promising abstraction for concurrent programming alternative to lock-based synchronizations. However, most TM models admit only isolated transactions, which are not adequate in multi-threaded programming where transactions have to interact via shared data before committing. In this paper, we present Open Transactional Memory (OTM), a programming abstraction supporting safe, data-driven interactions between composable memory transactions. This is achieved by relaxing isolation between transactions, still ensuring atomicity: threads of different transactions can interact by accessing shared variables, but then their transactions have to commit together-actually, these transactions are transparently merged. This model allows for loosely-coupled interactions since transaction merging is driven only by accesses to shared data, with no need to specify participants beforehand. In this paper we provide a specification of the OTM in the setting of Concurrent Haskell, showing that it is a conservative extension of current STM abstraction. In particular, we provide a formal semantics, which allows us to prove that OTM satisfies the \emph{opacity} criterion.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.