Paper detail

A spatiotemporal analysis of participatory sensing data "tweets" and extreme climate events toward real-time urban risk management

Real-time urban climate monitoring provides useful information that can be utilized to help monitor and adapt to extreme events, including urban heatwaves. Typical approaches to the monitoring of climate data include weather station monitoring and remote sensing. However, climate monitoring stations are very often distributed spatially in a sparse manner, and consequently, this has a significant impact on the ability to reveal exposure risks due to extreme climates at an intra-urban scale. Additionally, traditional remote sensing data sources are typically not received and analyzed in real-time which is often required for adaptive urban management of climate extremes, such as sudden heatwaves. Fortunately, recent social media, such as Twitter, furnishes real-time and high-resolution spatial information that might be useful for climate condition estimation. The objective of this study is utilizing geo-tagged tweets (participatory sensing data) for urban temperature analysis. We first detect tweets relating hotness (hot-tweets). Then, we study relationships between monitored temperatures and hot-tweets via a statistical model framework based on copula modelling methods. We demonstrate that there are strong relationships between "hot-tweets" and temperatures recorded at an intra-urban scale. Subsequently, we then investigate the application of "hot-tweets" informing spatio-temporal Gaussian process interpolation of temperatures as an application example of "hot-tweets". We utilize a combination of spatially sparse weather monitoring sensor data and spatially and temporally dense lower quality twitter data. Here, a spatial best linear unbiased estimation technique is applied. The result suggests that tweets provide some useful auxiliary information for urban climate assessment. Lastly, effectiveness of tweets toward a real-time urban risk management is discussed based on the results.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.