Paper detail

A solution to the finitizability problem for quantifier logics with equality

We consider countable so-called rich subsemigroups of (ωω,\circ); each such semigroup $T$ gives a variety CPEA_T that is axiomatizable by a finite schema of equations taken in a countable subsignature of that of ω-dimensional cylindric-polyadic algebras with equality where substitutions are restricted to maps in T. It is shown that for any such T, A\in CPEA_T iff A is representable as a concrete set algebra of ω-ary relations. The operations in the signature are set-theoretically interpreted like in polyadic equality set algebras, but such operations are relativized to a union of cartesian spaces that are not necessarily disjoint. This is a form of guarding semantics. We show that CPEA_T is canonical and atom-canonical. Imposing an extra condition on T, we prove that atomic algebras in CPEA_T are completely representable and that CPEA_T has the super amalgamation property. If T is rich and {\it finitely represented}, it is shown that CPEA_T is term definitionally equivalent to a finitely axiomatizable Sahlqvist variety. Such semigroups exist. This can be regarded as a solution to the central finitizability problem in algebraic logic for first order logic {\it with equality} if we do not insist on full fledged commutativity of quantifiers. The finite dimensional case is approached from the view point of guarded and clique guarded (relativized) semantics of fragments of first order logic using finitely many variables. Both positive and negative results are presented.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.