Paper detail

A solution space for a system of null-state partial differential equations 2

This article is the second of four that completely characterize a solution space $\mathcal{S}_N$ for a homogeneous system of $2N+3$ linear partial differential equations (PDEs) in 2N variables that arises in conformal field theory (CFT) and multiple Schramm-Lowner evolution (SLE). The system comprises $2N$ null-state equations and three conformal Ward identities which govern CFT correlation functions of $2N$ one-leg boundary operators. In the first article (part I), we use methods of analysis and linear algebra to prove that $\dim\mathcal{S}_N\leq C_N$, with $C_N$ the $N$th Catalan number. The analysis of that article is complete except for the proof of a lemma that it invokes. This article provides the proof. The lemma states that if every interval among $(x_2,x_3),$ $(x_3,x_4), ... ,(x_{2N-1},x_{2N})$ is a two-leg interval of $F\in\mathcal{S}_N$, then $F$ vanishes. Proving this lemma by contradiction, we show that the existence of such a nonzero function implies the existence of a non-vanishing CFT two-point function involving primary operators with different conformal weights, an impossibility. This proof (which is rigorous in spite of our occasional reference to CFT) involves two different types of estimates, those that give the asymptotic behavior of F as the length of one interval vanishes, and those that give this behavior as the lengths of two intervals vanish simultaneously. We derive these estimates by using Green functions to rewrite certain null-state PDEs as integral equations, combining other null-state PDEs to obtain Schauder interior estimates, and then repeatedly integrating the integral equations with these estimates until we obtain optimal bounds. In the case where two adjacent interval lengths vanish, we use a Green function that contains the Jacobi heat kernel as its essential ingredient.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.