Paper detail

A Small-Eddy-Dissipation Mechanism for Developing Turbulence Models

Jin (Phys. Fluids, vol. 31, 2019, p. 125102) proposed a new turbulence simulation method which shows better performance than other classic turbulence models. It is composed of a small-eddy-dissipation mixing length (SED-ML) model for calculating the reference solution and a parameter extension method for correcting the solution. The mechanism of this method is more deeply analyzed in this study to find out how to develop a turbulence model with a high accuracy and a low computational cost. The turbulent channel flows with Re_tau=821 and 2003 and decaying homogenous and isotropic turbulence are simulated to demonstrate how the new turbulence simulation method works. The small-eddy-dissipation (SED) mechanism for developing turbulence models has been proposed through our analysis. According to this mechanism, the model solution is an asymptotic approximation of the exact solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. The modeling term introduces an artificial dissipation which dissipates small eddies. The purpose of turbulence modeling is to dissipate more small eddies without changing the statistical solution qualitatively. We expect more small eddies can be dissipated where the turbulence is stronger. This mechanism is different from RANS which approximates the Reynolds stresses and LES which approximates the sub-grid-scale (SGS) motions, while it interprets the physics of turbulence modeling more precisely. A modified mixing length with two damping functions is developed to identify the characteristic length of turbulence, leading to the SED-ML model. The simulation accuracy can be further improved using a linear extension. Our numerical results show that the SED-ML model is in accordance with the SED mechanism. This might explain why the new method is more accurate than RANS while it requires a lower computational cost than LES.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.