Paper detail

A Size-Sensitive Discrepancy Bound for Set Systems of Bounded Primal Shatter Dimension

Let $(X,§)$ be a set system on an $n$-point set $X$. The \emph{discrepancy} of $§$ is defined as the minimum of the largest deviation from an even split, over all subsets of $S \in §$ and two-colorings $χ$ on $X$. We consider the scenario where, for any subset $X' \subseteq X$ of size $m \le n$ and for any parameter $1 \le k \le m$, the number of restrictions of the sets of $§$ to $X'$ of size at most $k$ is only $O(m^{d_1} k^{d-d_1})$, for fixed integers $d > 0$ and $1 \le d_1 \le d$ (this generalizes the standard notion of \emph{bounded primal shatter dimension} when $d_1 = d$). In this case we show that there exists a coloring $χ$ with discrepancy bound $O^{*}(|S|^{1/2 - d_1/(2d)} n^{(d_1 - 1)/(2d)})$, for each $S \in §$, where $O^{*}(\cdot)$ hides a polylogarithmic factor in $n$. This bound is tight up to a polylogarithmic factor \cite{Mat-95, Mat-99} and the corresponding coloring $χ$ can be computed in expected polynomial time using the very recent machinery of Lovett and Meka for constructive discrepancy minimization \cite{LM-12}. Our bound improves and generalizes the bounds obtained from the machinery of Har-Peled and Sharir \cite{HS-11} (and the follow-up work in \cite{SZ-12}) for points and halfspaces in $d$-space for $d \ge 3$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.