Paper detail

A single galaxy population? statistical evidence that the Star-Forming Main Sequence might be the tip of the iceberg

According to their specific star formation rate (sSFR), galaxies are often divided into `star-forming&#39; and `passive&#39; populations. It is argued that the former define a narrow `Main Sequence of Star-Forming Galaxies&#39; (MSSF) of the form $\sSFR(\Mstar)$, whereas `passive&#39; galaxies feature negligible levels of star formation activity. Here we use data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Galaxy and Mass Assembly survey at $z<0.1$ to constrain the conditional probability of the specific star formation rate at a given stellar mass. We show that the whole population of galaxies in the local Universe is consistent with a simple probability distribution with only one maximum (roughly corresponding to the MSSF) and relatively shallow power-law tails that fully account for the `passive&#39; population. We compare the quality of the fits provided by such unimodal ansatz against those coming from a double log-normal fit (illustrating the bimodal paradigm), finding that both descriptions are roughly equally compatible with the current data. In addition, we study the physical interpretation of the bidimensional distribution across the $M_*-\sSFR$ plane and discuss potential implications from a theoretical and observational point of view. We also investigate correlations with metallicity, morphology and environment, highlighting the need to consider at least an additional parameter in order to fully specify the physical state of a galaxy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.