Paper detail

A Simple Unified Spectroscopic Indicator of Stellar Luminosity: the Extended Flux Weighted Gravity-Luminosity Relationship

We show that for a wide range of stellar masses, from 0.3 to 20 Msun, and for evolutionary phases from the main sequence to the beginning of the red giant stage, the stellar flux weighted gravity, g_F ~ g/Teff^4, is tightly correlated with absolute bolometric magnitude Mbol. Such a correlation is predicted by stellar evolution theory. We confirm this relation observationally, using a sample of 445 stars with precise stellar parameters. It holds over 17 stellar magnitudes from Mbol = 9.0 mag to -8.0 mag with a scatter of 0.17 mag above Mbol = -3.0 and 0.29 mag below this value. We then test the relation with 2.2 million stars with 6.5 mag > Mbol > 0.5 mag, where 'mass-produced' but robust log g, Teff and Mbol from LAMOST DR5 and Gaia DR2 are available. We find that the same relation holds with a scatter of ~0.2 mag for single stars offering a simple spectroscopic distance estimate good to ~10 percent.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.