Paper detail

A simple self-interaction correction to RPA-like correlation energies

The random phase approximation (RPA) is exact for the exchange energy of a many-electron ground state, but RPA makes the correlation energy too negative by about 0.5 eV/electron. That large short-range error, which tends to cancel out of iso-electronic energy differences, is largely corrected by an exchange-correlation kernel, or (as in RPA+) by an additive local or semilocal correction. RPA+ is by construction exact for the homogeneous electron gas, and it is also accurate for the jellium surface. RPA+ often gives realistic total energies for atoms or solids in which spin-polarization corrections are absent or small. RPA and RPA+ also yield realistic singlet binding energy curves for H2 and N2, and thus RPA+ yields correct total energies even for spin-unpolarized atoms with fractional spins and strong correlation, as in stretched H2 or N2. However, RPA and RPA+ can be very wrong for spin-polarized one-electron systems (especially for stretched H2+), and also for the spin-polarization energies of atoms. The spin-polarization energy is often a small part of the total energy of an atom, but important for ionization energies, electron affinities, and the atomization energies of molecules. Here we propose a computationally efficient generalized RPA+ (gRPA+) that changes RPA+ only for spin-polarized systems by making gRPA+ exact for all one-electron densities, in the same simple semilocal way that the correlation energy densities of many meta-generalized gradent approximations are made self-correlation free. By construction, gRPA+ does not degrade the exact RPA+ description of jellium. gRPA+ is found to greatly improve upon RPA and RPA+ for the ionization energies and electron affinities of light atoms. Many versions of RPA with an approximate exchange-correlation kernel fail to be exact for all one-electron densities, and they can also be self-interaction corrected in this way.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.