Paper detail

A simple scheme for the parallelization of particle filters and its application to the tracking of complex stochastic systems

We investigate the use of possibly the simplest scheme for the parallelisation of the standard particle filter, that consists in splitting the computational budget into $M$ fully independent particle filters with $N$ particles each, and then obtaining the desired estimators by averaging over the $M$ independent outcomes of the filters. This approach minimises the parallelisation overhead yet displays highly desirable theoretical properties. Under very mild assumptions, we analyse the mean square error (MSE) of the estimators of 1-dimensional statistics of the optimal filtering distribution and show explicitly the effect of parallelisation scheme on the convergence rate. Specifically, we study the decomposition of the MSE into variance and bias components, to show that the former decays as $\frac{1}{MN}$, i.e., linearly with the total number of particles, while the latter converges towards $0$ as $\frac{1}{N^2}$. Parallelisation, therefore, has the obvious advantage of dividing the running times while preserving the (asymptotic) performance of the particle filter. Following this lead, we propose a time-error index to compare schemes with different degrees of parallelisation. Finally, we provide two numerical examples. The first one deals with the tracking of a Lorenz 63 chaotic system with dynamical noise and partial (noisy) observations, while the second example involves a dynamical network of modified FitzHugh-Nagumo (FH-N) stochastic nodes. The latter is a large dimensional system ($\approx3,000$ state variables in our computer experiments) designed to numerically reproduce typical electrical phenomena observed in the atria of the human heart. In both examples, we show how the proposed parallelisation scheme attains the same approximation accuracy as a centralised particle filter with only a small fraction of the running time, using a standard multicore computer.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.