Paper detail

A Simple Random-Walk Model Explains the Disruption Process of Hierarchical, Eccentric 3-Body Systems

We study the disruption process of hierarchical 3-body systems with bodies of comparable mass. Such systems have long survival times that vary by orders of magnitude depending on the initial conditions. By comparing with 3-body numerical integrations, we show that the evolution and disruption of such systems can be statistically described as a simple random-walk process in the outer-orbit's energy, where the energy-exchange per pericenter passage (step-size) is calculated from the initial conditions. In our derivation of the step-size, we use previous analytic results for parabolic encounters, and average over the (Kozai-Lidov) oscillations in orbital parameters, which are faster then the energy diffusion timescale. While similar random-walk models were studied before, this work differs in two manners: (a) this is the first time that the Kozai-Lidov averaged step-size is derived from first principles and demonstrated to reproduce the statistical evolution of numerical ensembles without fitting parameters, and (b) it provides a characteristic life-time, instead of answering the binary question (stable/unstable), set by case-specific criteria.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.