Paper detail

A simple proof of uniqueness of the particle trajectories for solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations

We give a simple proof of the uniqueness of fluid particle trajectories corresponding to: 1) the solution of the two-dimensional Navier Stokes equations with an initial condition that is only square integrable, and 2) the local strong solution of the three-dimensional equations with an $H^{1/2}$-regular initial condition i.e.\ with the minimal Sobolev regularity known to guarantee uniqueness. This result was proved by Chemin & Lerner (J Diff Eq 121 (1995) 314-328) using the Littlewood-Paley theory for the flow in the whole space $\R^d$, $d\ge 2$. We first show that the solutions of the differential equation $\dot{X}=u(X,t)$ are unique if $u\in L^p(0,T;H^{(d/2)-1})$ for some $p>1$ and $\sqrt{t}\,u\in L^2(0,T;H^{(d/2)+1})$. We then prove, using standard energy methods, that the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations with initial condition in $H^{(d/2)-1}$ satisfies these conditions. This proof is also valid for the more physically relevant case of bounded domains.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.