Paper detail

A Simple Proof for the Existence of "Good" Pairs of Nested Lattices

This paper provides a simplified proof for the existence of nested lattice codebooks allowing to achieve the capacity of the additive white Gaussian noise channel, as well as the optimal rate-distortion trade-off for a Gaussian source. The proof is self-contained and relies only on basic probabilistic and geometrical arguments. An ensemble of nested lattices that is different, and more elementary, than the one used in previous proofs is introduced. This ensemble is based on lifting different subcodes of a linear code to the Euclidean space using Construction A. In addition to being simpler, our analysis is less sensitive to the assumption that the additive noise is Gaussian. In particular, for additive ergodic noise channels it is shown that the achievable rates of the nested lattice coding scheme depend on the noise distribution only via its power. Similarly, the nested lattice source coding scheme attains the same rate-distortion trade-off for all ergodic sources with the same second moment.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.