Paper detail

A simple model for the size-evolution of elliptical galaxies

We use semi-analytical modelling of galaxy formation to predict the redshift-size-evolution of elliptical galaxies. Using a simple model in which relative sizes of elliptical galaxies of a given mass correlate with the fraction of stars formed in a star burst during a major merger event, we are able to reproduce the observed size redshif t evolution. The size evolution is a result of the amount of cold gas available during the major merger. Mergers at high redshifts are gas-rich and produce ellipticals with smaller sizes. In particular we find a power-law relation between the sizes at different redshifts, with the power-law index giving a measure of the relative amount of dissipation during the mergers that lead to the formation of an elliptical. The size evolution is found to be stronger for more massive galaxies as they involve more gas at high redshifts when they form compared to less massive ellipticals. Local ellipticals more massive than $5 \times 10^{11}$ M$_{\odot}$ will be approximately 4 times larger than their counterparts at $z=2$. Our results indicate that the scatter in the size of similar massive present day elliptical galaxies is a result of their formation epoch, with smaller ellipticals being formed earlier.

preprint2006arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.