Paper detail

A simple arithmetic criterion for graphs being determined by their generalized spectra

A graph $G$ is said to be determined by its generalized spectrum (DGS for short) if for any graph $H$, $H$ and $G$ are cospectral with cospectral complements implies that $H$ is isomorphic to $G$. It turns out that whether a graph $G$ is DGS is closely related to the arithmetic properties of its walk-matrix. More precisely, let $A$ be the adjacency matrix of a graph $G$, and let $W =[e, Ae, A^2e,...,A^{n-1}e]$ ($e$ is the all-one vector) be its \textit{walk-matrix}. Denote by $\mathcal{G}_n$ the set of all graphs on $n$ vertices with $\det(W)\neq 0$. In [Wang, Generalized spectral characterization of graphs revisited, The Electronic J. Combin., 20 (4),(2013), #$P_4$], the author defined a large family of graphs $$\mathcal{F}_n = \{G \in{\mathcal{G}_n}|\frac{\det(W)}{2^{\lfloor\frac{n}{2}\rfloor}}{is~ an ~odd~ square-free~ integer}\}$$ (which may have positive density among all graphs, as suggested by some numerical experiments) and conjectured every graph in $\mathcal{F}_n$ is DGS. In this paper, we show that the conjecture is actually true, thereby giving a simple arithmetic condition for determining whether a graph is DGS.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.