Paper detail

A simple and fast method to determine the parameters for fuzzy c-means cluster validation

Fuzzy c-means clustering is widely used to identify cluster structures in high-dimensional data sets, such as those obtained in DNA microarray and quantitative proteomics experiments. One of its main limitations is the lack of a computationally fast method to determine the two parameters fuzzifier and cluster number. Wrong parameter values may either lead to the inclusion of purely random fluctuations in the results or ignore potentially important data. The optimal solution has parameter values for which the clustering does not yield any results for a purely random data set but which detects cluster formation with maximum resolution on the edge of randomness. Estimation of the optimal parameter values is achieved by evaluation of the results of the clustering procedure applied to randomized data sets. In this case, the optimal value of the fuzzifier follows common rules that depend only on the main properties of the data set. Taking the dimension of the set and the number of objects as input values instead of evaluating the entire data set allows us to propose a functional relationship determining its value directly. This result speaks strongly against setting the fuzzifier equal to 2 as typically done in many previous studies. Validation indices are generally used for the estimation of the optimal number of clusters. A comparison shows that the minimum distance between the centroids provides results that are at least equivalent or better than those obtained by other computationally more expensive indices.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.