Paper detail

A Short GRB "No-Host'' Problem? Investigating Large Progenitor Offsets for Short GRBs with Optical Afterglows

[abridged] We investigate the afterglow properties and large-scale environments of several short-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with sub-arcsecond optical afterglow positions but no bright coincident host galaxies. The purpose of this joint study is to robustly assess the possibility of significant offsets, a hallmark of the compact object binary merger model. Five such events exist in the current sample of 20 short bursts with optical afterglows, and we find that their optical, X-ray, and gamma-ray emission are systematically fainter. These differences may be due to lower circumburst densities (by about an order of magnitude), to higher redshifts (by dz~0.5-1), or to lower energies, although in the standard GRB model the smaller gamma-ray fluences cannot be explained by lower densities. To study the large-scale environments we use deep optical observations to place limits on underlying hosts and to determine probabilities of chance coincidence for galaxies near each burst. In 4 of the 5 cases the lowest probabilities of chance coincidence (P(<dR)~0.1) are associated with bright galaxies at separations of dR~10", while somewhat higher probabilities of chance coincidence are associated with faint galaxies at separations of ~2". By measuring redshifts for the brighter galaxies in three cases (z=0.111, 0.473, 0.403) we find physical offsets of ~30-75 kpc, while for the faint hosts the assumption of z>1 leads to offsets of ~15 kpc. Alternatively, the limits at the burst positions (>26 mag) can be explained by typical short GRB host galaxies (L~0.1-1 L*) at z>2. Thus, two possibilities exist: (i) ~1/4 of short GRBs explode ~50 kpc or ~15 kpc from the centers of z~0.3 or z>1 galaxies, respectively, and have fainter afterglows due to the resulting lower densities; or (ii) ~1/4 of short GRBs occur at z>2 and have fainter afterglows due to their higher redshifts.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.