Paper detail

A sharp rise in the detection rate of broad absorption line variations in a quasar SDSS J141955.26+522741.1

We present an analysis of the variability of broad absorption lines (BALs) in a quasar SDSS J141955.26+522741.1 at $z=2.145$ with 72 observations from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 16 (SDSS DR16). The strong correlation between the equivalent widths of BAL and the continuum luminosity, reveals that the variation of BAL trough is dominated by the photoionization. The photoionization model predicts that when the time interval $ΔT$ between two observations is longer than the recombination timescale $t_{\rm rec}$, the BAL variations can be detected. This can be characterized as a "sharp rise" in the detection rate of BAL variation at $ΔT=t_{\rm rec}$. For the first time, we detect such a "sharp rise" signature in the detection rate of BAL variations. As a result, we propose that the $t_{\rm rec}$ can be obtained from the "sharp rise" of the detection rate of BAL variation. It is worth mentioning that the BAL variations are detected at the time-intervals less than the $t_{\rm rec}$ for half an order of magnitude in two individual troughs. This result indicates that there may be multiple components with different $t_{\rm rec}$ but the same velocity in an individual trough.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.