Paper detail

A Shared Parameter Model for Systolic Blood Pressure Accounting for Data Missing Not at Random in the HUNT Study

In this work, blood pressure eleven years ahead is modeled using data from a longitudinal population-based health survey, the Trondelag Health (HUNT) Study, while accounting for missing data due to dropout between consecutive surveys (20-50 %). We propose and validate a shared parameter model (SPM) in the Bayesian framework with age, sex, body mass index, and initial blood pressure as explanatory variables. Further, we propose a novel evaluation scheme to assess data missing not at random (MNAR) by comparing the predictive performance of the fitted SPM with and without conditioning on the missing process. The results demonstrate that the SPM is suitable for inference for a dataset of this size (cohort of 64385 participants) and structure. The SPM indicates data MNAR and gives different parameter estimates than a naive model assuming data missing at random. The SPM and naive models are compared based on predictive performance in a validation dataset. The naive model performs slightly better than the SPM for the present participants. This is in accordance with results from a simulation study based on the SPM where we find that the naive model performs better for the present participants, while the SPM performs better for the dropouts.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.