Paper detail

A serendipitous survey for variability amongst the massive stellar population of Westerlund 1

Massive stars exhibit spectroscopic and photometric variability over a wide range of timescales. However the physical mechanisms driving this behaviour remain poorly understood. Westerlund 1 presents an ideal laboratory for studying these processes in a rich, coeval population of post-main sequence stars and we present a pathfinding study aimed at characterising their variability utilising the large body of data that has accumulated since the 1960s. Spectroscopic variability attributable to both wind asphericity and photospheric pulsations was present amongst both the hot and cool stellar populations. Given the limitations imposed by the data, we were unable to determine the physical origin of the wind structure inferred for the OB supergiants, although the inhomogineities in the winds of the Wolf Rayets are likely driven by binary interactions and, conversely, by pulsations in at least one of the cool hypergiants. Photospheric pulsations were found for stars ranging from spectral types as early as O9 I through to the mid F Ia+ yellow hypergiants - with a possible dependence on the luminosity class amongst the OB stars. The spectroscopically variable red supergiants (M2-5 Ia) are also potential pulsators but require further observations to confirm this hypothesis. Determination of the amplitude and periodicity of these pulsations as a function of temperature, luminosity and evolutionary state holds open the prospect of identifying the physical mechanisms driving the instabilities that constrain and define stellar evolution in the upper reaches of the HR diagram, while the presence of highly luminous yellow hypergiants and red supergiants within Wd1 place strong constraints on post-main sequence evolutionary pathways, apparently contradicting current theoretical predictions for >25Msun stars at solar metallicites. [ABRIDGED]

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.