Paper detail

A semilinear equation involving the fractional Laplacian in $\mathbb{R}^n$

In this paper, we consider the semilinear equation involving the fractional Laplacian in the Euclidian space $\mathbb{R}^n$: \begin{equation} (-Δ)^{α/2} u(x) = f(x_n) \,u^p(x), \quad x \in \mathbb{R}^n \label{n26} \end{equation} in the subcritical case with $1<p<\frac{n+α}{n-α}$. Instead of carrying out direct investigations on pseudo-differential equation (\ref{n26}), we first seek its equivalent form in an integral equation as below: \begin{equation} u(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}G_{\infty}(x,y)\,f(y_n)\, u^{p}(y)\,dy, \label{n27} \end{equation} where $ G_{\infty}(x,y)$ is the Green's function associated with the fractional Laplacian in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Exploiting the \emph{method of moving planes in integral forms}, we are able to derive the nonexistence of positive solutions for (\ref{n27}) in the subcritical case. Hence the same conclusion is true for (\ref{n26}).

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.