Paper detail

A Selection Region Based Routing Protocol for Random Mobile ad hoc Networks

We propose a selection region based multi-hop routing protocol for random mobile ad hoc networks, where the selection region is defined by two parameters: a reference distance and a selection angle. At each hop, a relay is chosen as the nearest node to the transmitter that is located within the selection region. By assuming that the relay nodes are randomly placed, we derive an upper bound for the optimum reference distance to maximize the expected density of progress and investigate the relationship between the optimum selection angle and the optimum reference distance. We also note that the optimized expected density of progress scales as $Θ(\sqrtλ)$, which matches the prior results in the literature. Compared with the spatial-reuse multi-hop protocol in \cite{Baccelli:Aloha} recently proposed by Baccelli \emph{et al.}, in our new protocol the amount of nodes involved and the calculation complexity for each relay selection are reduced significantly, which is attractive for energy-limited wireless ad hoc networks (e.g., wireless sensor networks).

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.