Paper detail

A See-Saw $S_4$ model for fermion masses and mixings

We present a supersymmetric see-saw $S_4$ model giving rise to the most general neutrino mass matrix compatible with Tri-Bimaximal mixing. We adopt the $S_4\times Z_5$ flavour symmetry, broken by suitable vacuum expectation values of a small number of flavon fields. We show that the vacuum alignment is a natural solution of the most general superpotential allowed by the flavour symmetry, without introducing any soft breaking terms. In the charged lepton sector, mass hierarchies are controlled by the spontaneous breaking of the flavour symmetry caused by the vevs of one doublet and one triplet flavon fields instead of using the Froggatt-Nielsen U(1) mechanism. The next to leading order corrections to both charged lepton mass matrix and flavon vevs generate corrections to the mixing angles as large as ${\cal O}(λ_C^2)$. Applied to the quark sector, the symmetry group $S_4\times Z_5$ can give a leading order $V_{CKM}$ proportional to the identity as well as a matrix with ${\cal O}(1)$ coefficients in the Cabibbo $2\times 2$ submatrix. Higher order corrections produce non vanishing entries in the other $V_{CKM}$ entries which are generically of ${\cal O}(λ_C^2)$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.