Paper detail

A second look at the Gaussian semiclassical soliton ensemble for the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation

We present the results of a numerical experiment inspired by the semiclassical (zero-dispersion) limit of the focusing nonlinear Schroedinger (NLS) equation. In particular, we focus on the Gaussian semiclassical soliton ensemble, a family of exact multisoliton solutions obtained by repeatedly solving the initial-value problem for a particular sequence of initial data. The sequence of data is generated by adding an asymptotically vanishing sequence of perturbations to pure Gaussian initial data. These perturbations are obtained by applying the inverse-scattering transform to formal WKB approximations of eigenvalues of the associated spectral problem with a Gaussian potential. Recent results [Lee, Lyng, & Vankova, Physica D 24 (2012):1767--1781] suggest that, remarkably, these perturbations---interlaced as they are with the integrable structure of the equation---do not excite the acute modulational instabilities that are known to be present in the semiclassical regime. Here, we provide additional evidence to support the claim that these WKB-induced perturbations indeed have a very special structure. In particular, as a control experiment, we examine the evolution from a family of initial data created by an asymptotically vanishing family of analytic perturbations which are qualitatively indistinguishable from the WKB-induced perturbations that generate the Gaussian semiclassical soliton ensemble. We then compare this evolution to the (numerically computed) true evolution of the Gaussian and also to the evolution of the corresponding members of the semiclassical soliton ensemble. Our results both highlight the exceptional nature of the WKB-induced perturbations used to generate the semiclassical soliton ensemble and provide new insight into the sensitivity properties of the semiclassical limit problem for the focusing NLS equation.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.