Paper detail

A Second Look at 12 Candidate Dual AGNs using ${\tt BAYMAX}$

We present an analysis of 12 optically selected dual AGN candidates at $z < 0.34$. Each candidate was originally identified via double-peaked [O III] $λ$5007 emission lines, and have received follow-up $Chandra$ and $HST$ observations. Because the X-ray data are low-count ($<100$ counts) with small separations ($<1$&#34;), a robust analysis is necessary for classifying each source. Pairing long-slit [O III] observations with existing $Chandra$ observations, we re-analyze the X-ray observations with ${\tt BAYMAX}$ to determine whether the X-ray emission from each system is more likely a single or dual point source. We find that 4 of the 12 sources are likely dual X-ray point source systems. We examine each point source&#39;s spectra via a Monte Carlo method that probabilistically identifies the likely origin of each photon. When doing so, we find that (i) the secondary X-ray point sources in 2 of the systems have $L_{\mathrm{X}}<10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$, such that we cannot rule out a non-AGN origin, (ii) one source has a secondary with $L_{\mathrm{X}}>10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$ but a spectrum that is too soft to definitively preclude being X-ray emitting diffuse gas that was photoionized by the primary AGN, and (iii) one system (SDSS J1126+2944) is a dual AGN. Additionally, using complementary $HST$ observations, we analyze a sub-sample of systems that are visually identified as merging. Our results suggest that dual AGNs may preferentially reside in mergers with small separations, consistent with both simulations and observations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.