Paper detail

A Search for z=7.3 Lyα Emitters behind Gravitationally Lensing Clusters

We searched for z=7.3 Lya emitters (LAEs) behind two lensing clusters, Abell 2390 and CL 0024, with the Subaru Telescope Suprime-Cam and a narrowband NB1006 (FWHM ~ 21 nm centered at 1005 nm). We investigated if there exist objects consistent with the color of z=7.3 LAEs behind the clusters but could not detect any LAEs to the unlensed line limit F(Lya) ~ 6.9 x 10^{-18} erg/s/cm^2. Using several z=7 Lya luminosity functions (LFs) from the literature, we estimated and compared the expected detection numbers of z ~ 7 LAEs in lensing and blank field surveys in the case of using an 8m class ground based telescope. Given the steep bright-end slope of the LFs, when the detector field-of view (FOV) is comparable to the angular extent of a massive lensing cluster, imaging cluster(s) is more efficient in detecting z ~ 7 LAEs than imaging a blank field. However, the gain is expected to be modest, a factor of two at most and likely much less depending on the adopted LFs. The main advantage of lensing-cluster survey, therefore, remains to be the gain in depth and not necessarily in detection efficiency. For much larger detectors, the lensing effect becomes negligible and the efficiency of LAE detection is proportional to the instrumental FOV. We also inspected NB1006 images of three z ~ 7 z-dropouts previously detected in Abell 2390 and found that none of them are detected in NB1006. Two of them are consistent with predictions from the previous studies that they would be at lower redshifts. The other one has a photometric redshift of z ~ 7.3, and if it is at z=7.3, its unlensed Lya line flux would be very faint: F(Lya) < 4.4 x 10^{-18} erg/s/cm^2 (1 sigma upper limit) or rest frame equivalent width of W(Lya) < 26A. Its Lya emission might be attenuated by neutral hydrogen, as recent studies show that the fraction of Lyman break galaxies displaying strong Lya emission is lower at z ~ 7 than at z <~ 6.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.