Paper detail

A Search for Neutral Carbon towards two z=4.05 Submillimetre Galaxies, GN20 and GN20.2

Using the IRAM Plateau-de-Bure Interferometer (PdBI) we have searched for the upper fine structure line of neutral carbon (CI(2->1), nu_rest = 809 GHz) and 12CO(J=7->6) (nu_rest=806GHz) towards the submillimetre galaxies (SMGs) GN20 (SMM J123711.9+622212, z = 4.055) and GN20.2 (SMM J123708.8+622202, z = 4.051). The far-infrared (FIR) continuum is detected at 8sigma significance in GN20, with a flux density of S_1.8mm = 1.9+-0.2mJy, while no continuum is detected in GN20.2. Both sources are statistically undetected in both CI and CO(7-6) lines; we derive line luminosity limits for both CI and CO of L'<~2x10^10K km s^-1 pc^2. Assuming carbon excitation temperatures of T_ex = 30K (the galaxies' measured dust temperatures), we infer CI mass limits of M_CI < 5.4x10^6 Msun (GN20) and M_CI < 6.8x10^6 Msun (GN20.2). The derived CI abundance limits are <1.8x10^-5 for GN20 and <3.8x10^-5 for GN20.2 implying that the systems have Milky Way level neutral carbon enrichment (X[CI]/X[H2]) or lower, similar to high-redshift carbon-detected systems (at 5x10^-5) but about 50 times less than the neutral carbon enrichment of local starburst galaxies. Observations of GN20 and GN20.2 in high-resolution MERLIN+VLA radio maps of GOODS-N are used to further constrain the sizes and locations of active regions. We conclude that the physical gas properties of young rapidly evolving systems like GN20 and GN20.2 are likely significantly different than starburst/ULIRG environments in the local Universe yet similar to z~2 SMGs. Unless gravitationally amplified examples can be found, observations of galaxies like GN20 will require the order of magnitude increase in sensitivity of the Atacama Large Millimetre Array (ALMA) to constrain their CI and high-J CO content, despite the fact that they are the brightest systems at z~4.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access18 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.